Skip to Content

Research & Commentary Results

Filter by
1124 Results
Rob Malley Argues Two States Is an Illusion
  • Podcast
  • Rob Malley Argues Two States Is an Illusion

    Brian sits down with Robert Malley, a former US official best known for his role as the lead negotiator of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Malley discusses the motivations behind his new book, Tomorrow Is Yesterday: Life, Death, and the Pursuit of Peace in Israel/Palestine, and offers his assessment of American perspectives on the war in Gaza. The conversation also explores his personal background as the son​ of an Egyptian Jewish father and an American Jewish mother—both outspoken on the political left—and how that upbringing shaped his worldview, alongside a career spanning the Clinton, Obama, and Biden administrations.

     

    A year after Assad’s fall, Syria faces a pivotal moment. Washington must lead.
  • Commentary
  • A year after Assad’s fall, Syria faces a pivotal moment. Washington must lead.

    One year after the fall of the Assad regime, Syria is still in very fragile phase of its transition to a new political order. The country faces monumental reconstruction challenges, estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars, well beyond the capabilities of the new Syrian government. Without sustained American leadership and investment, Syria’s transition will be slow, fragile, and dangerously reversible.

    How Iraq’s vote will shape the next phase of US-Iran competition
    Photo by Ameer Al-Mohammedawi/picture alliance via Getty Images
  • Analysis
  • How Iraq’s vote will shape the next phase of US-Iran competition

    For Iran, Iraq is strategic depth, political sanctuary, and economic lifeline all at once. The results of the November 11 Iraqi elections will decide who in Baghdad controls the budgetary levers, internal security appointments, and committees that could codify, or constrain, Iraq’s Iran-backed militias.

    An International Stabilization Force for Gaza
  • Policy Memo
  • An International Stabilization Force for Gaza

    The United States plans to submit a resolution on Gaza to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) by the end of November. Reportedly, the latest draft endorses President Donald Trump’s 20-point plan, recognizes the Board of Peace (BoP) as a “transitional governance administration,” and authorizes the BoP to establish an International Stabilization Force (ISF). The UN resolution is a first step to achieving buy-in from potential ISF contributors. In turn, a viable ISF will be one key to moving beyond the cease-fire to securing the 20-point plan’s envisioned Hamas disarmament, further Israeli military withdrawal, and a path to Palestinian governance. The US faces several dilemmas as it seeks to transition from cease-fire to stabilization and beyond.  

    Will Syria join the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS?
    US Army photo by Sgt. Julio Hernandez courtesy of CENTCOM
  • Analysis
  • Will Syria join the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS?

    The joint al-Dumayr operation in mid-October was the fifth instance of coordination between the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS and the Syrian government to confront the Islamic State, amid Western calls for Damascus to officially join the international effort. What’s at stake and what are the potential scenarios moving forward?

    October 27, 2025

    Defining and stabilizing Lebanon’s borders
    Photo by Christina Assi/AFP via Getty Images
  • Analysis
  • Defining and stabilizing Lebanon’s borders

    The central challenge facing Lebanon today is whether the country will graduate to functional statehood or continue struggling to survive. Yet with Lebanese officials now insisting that the state “monopolize arms” and become the decisive arbiter on matters of war and peace, a relevant question arises: Where, territorially, does Lebanon begin and end?

    October 20, 2025

    Has Pakistan agreed to use nuclear force to defend Saudi Arabia?
  • Video
  • Has Pakistan agreed to use nuclear force to defend Saudi Arabia?

    Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed a mutual defense pact on September 17, 2025, declaring that “any aggression against either country shall be considered an aggression against both.” The wording of the agreement sparked speculation that Pakistan might use its nuclear capabilities to defend Saudi Arabia. MEI’s F. Gregory Gause contends otherwise, offering insight into the history and strategic calculations driving the deal. To learn more about the deal, visit our website.

    Pakistan’s strategic defense pact with Saudi Arabia: A new security architecture in the wider Middle East
    Photo via Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  • Analysis
  • Pakistan’s strategic defense pact with Saudi Arabia: A new security architecture in the wider Middle East

    Following Israel’s September 9 strike on Hamas targets in Qatar, Pakistan has taken swift and significant foreign policy steps in response and adopted an unusually assertive stance. This shift was largely influenced by Pakistan’s military chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir. The latter is determined to enhance his country’s strategic autonomy and diplomatic leverage in an increasingly complex international environment by positioning Pakistan as a key security actor and an emerging middle power on the global stage.

    Silent leverage, quiet gains? China and the Saudi-Pakistan defense pact
    Photo by Madoka Ikegami-Pool/Getty Images
  • Analysis
  • Silent leverage, quiet gains? China and the Saudi-Pakistan defense pact

    The Strategic Mutual Defense Agreement (SMDA) between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, signed in Riyadh on September 17, is far more than a bilateral pledge. It represents a profound reordering of alignments in the Gulf and South Asia, reflecting and reinforcing the broader erosion of US preeminence in the Eurasian security architecture. While much of the initial commentary centered on the striking commitment of a wealthy Gulf monarchy to the defense of a nuclear-armed South Asian state, as well as the question of whether Pakistan had in fact extended its nuclear umbrella to Saudi Arabia, the deeper story is arguably China’s potential advance.

    A Middle East NATO? Regional Security Options After Doha
    Middle East Institute
  • Podcast
  • A Middle East NATO? Regional Security Options After Doha

    Israel’s September 9 strike on Hamas leaders in Doha rattled Gulf capitals and revived a decades-old debate over whether the region needs a NATO-style defensive alliance. MEI Senior Fellow Jason Campbell joins hosts Alistair Taylor and Matthew Czekaj to unpack why past attempts at collective defense have fallen short, whether this moment is different, and what the crisis means for US security strategy in the Middle East.

    September 25, 2025

    Israel’s Doha strike could further destabilize region, undermine US security partnerships
    Photo by JACQUELINE PENNEY/AFPTV/AFP via Getty Images
  • Analysis
  • Israel’s Doha strike could further destabilize region, undermine US security partnerships

    The reverberations of Israel’s strike on the Hamas negotiating team in Doha yesterday are still rippling across the globe and will continue to for the foreseeable future. Its ramifications are profound and will alter the geopolitical landscape not just in the Middle East but likely on a global scale.

    Europe’s snapback gamble on Iran
    Photo by AFP via Getty Images
  • Analysis
  • Europe’s snapback gamble on Iran

    The coming weeks may prove decisive in Europe’s long struggle to manage Iran’s nuclear ambitions. On Aug. 28, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany announced they will trigger the “snapback” sanctions mechanism. Whether Europe’s gamble succeeds will determine both the future of non-proliferation and the credibility of Europe as a strategic actor.

    UNIFIL should reset or go home
    Photo by Niall Carson/PA Images via Getty Images
  • Analysis
  • UNIFIL should reset or go home

    At the end of August, the future of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), established nearly 50 years ago, goes on trial in New York, where the Security Council will debate the renewal of its mandate. Nearly two decades after its transformation under UN Security Council Resolution 1701, UNIFIL is now part of the problem it was created to solve. Ten thousand blue helmets from almost 50 countries, including major North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members, failed to stop the latest conflict between Israel and Hizballah, and, if business continues as usual, will fail to prevent the next.

    Lebanon and the UNIFIL Mandate: Disarming Hizballah and Reclaiming Sovereignty
    Middle East Institute
  • Podcast
  • Lebanon and the UNIFIL Mandate: Disarming Hizballah and Reclaiming Sovereignty

    With its new government at the half-year mark and the UNIFIL international peacekeeping force’s mandate due for reauthorization at month’s end, Lebanon stands at a pivotal moment. In this episode of Middle East Focus, hosts Alistair Taylor and Matthew Czekaj are joined by MEI Senior Fellow Fadi Nicholas Nassar to evaluate whether the Lebanese state can reclaim its sovereignty, starting with the disarmament of Hizballah and the enforcement of a cease-fire.

    August 7, 2025

    Digital frontlines: What the 12-day war revealed about the evolution of Iran’s cyber strategy
    Photo by SASAN/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images
  • Analysis
  • Digital frontlines: What the 12-day war revealed about the evolution of Iran’s cyber strategy

    During June’s Israel-Iran war, a quieter but significant battle played out in cyberspace, highlighting how Tehran has refined its use of digital tools to shape the battlespace, control domestic narratives, and project influence abroad. While largely ineffective in operational terms, Iran’s cyber response marked a new phase in its strategic evolution.

    August 4, 2025