Skip to Content
  • Commentary
  • Four Myths and Four Realities

    External Publication

    June 8, 2026

    David Hale
    David Hale

    Governance, Reform, and State Capacity, US Policy in the Middle East, Israel, Lebanon

    The debate in America about the Middle East today surfaces myths and realities.

    Myth 1: This conflict could have been avoided if the first Trump Administration had not withdrawn from the 2015 JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran.

    In fact, the capture of Iranian nuclear files by Israel before America’s 2018 withdrawal revealed that Iran had a) more advanced and comprehensive weapons than previously revealed, b) plans to continue and conceal its nuclear weapons program, and c) systematically deceived the IAEA watchdog, in violation of its adherence to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iran never deviated from its intent to build nuclear weapons. It obtained JCPOA’s sanctions relief knowing the agreement’s sunset deadlines would soon enough allow it to proceed without restrictions. President Obama himself acknowledged that advanced centrifuge development would enable Iran to possess zero enrichment breakout time by 2028. These flaws and others — such as the deal’s blind eye to Iran’s sponsorship of regional proxies — were why JCPOA had limited political support in the U.S. and among America’s Middle East partners. Iran got cash to fund its military and Arab proxies in return for a modest delay in its nuclear programs.

     

    Read More in This is Beirut

     

    Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images


    The Middle East Institute (MEI) is an independent, non-partisan, not-for-profit, educational organization. It does not engage in advocacy and its scholars’ opinions are their own. MEI welcomes financial donations, but retains sole editorial control over its work and its publications reflect only the authors’ views. For a listing of MEI donors, please click here.

    More Like This