This text has been translated by AI and may contain errors.
Skip to Content

Research & Commentary Results

Filter by
1974 Results
From “compassionate Islamism” to “Turkey first”
Syrian refugees who were suddenly deported from Turkey queue up to register with officials at the Bab al-Hawa crossing between Turkey and Syria's northwestern Idlib province on July 27, 2019. - More than 4,400 Syrians have been sent back via Bab al-Hawa so far in July 2019 -- against 4,300 in total in June, according to the crossing's spokesman. Since it started in 2011, the Syrian conflict left millions displaced at home and abroad, with some 3.5 million living in Turkey alone, according to the UN. (Photo
  • Analysis
  • From “compassionate Islamism” to “Turkey first”

    Debates about populism often lump Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan together with Donald Trump in the US, Vladimir Putin in Russia, and Viktor Orban in Hungary. All four are kindred spirits who have used the same tactics to gain and hold onto power. They stir up fear, divide societies, fuel social conflict, criminalize the opposition, and create internal and external enemies. On the issue of refugees, however, Erdogan has been the epitome of liberalism, setting him apart from his fellow populists.

    What will the European Council's new president mean for EU-MENA relations?
    Belgium's Prime minister Charles Michel (R) addresses journalists as he arrives for the second day of an European Union leaders summit to discuss Syria, relations with Russia, trade and migration, on October 21, 2016 at the European Council, in Brussels
  • Analysis
  • What will the European Council's new president mean for EU-MENA relations?

    While some changes may be in the offing, for now most signs suggest that regional leaders should expect neither new opportunities, nor new challenges, but more likely a broad continuity of existing EU policy toward the region.

    August 20, 2019

    The uneasy triangle between Turkey, the US, and the YPG
    Middle East Institute
  • Podcast
  • The uneasy triangle between Turkey, the US, and the YPG

    Turkey and the US recently announced an agreement for establishing a safe zone in northern Syria to serve as a buffer between Turkey and the YPG, which is seen by Ankara as a terrorist group and by Washington as a partner in the fight against ISIS. MEI’s Gonul Tol and Charles Lister join host Alistair Taylor to discuss how this policy may impact dynamics on the ground.

    August 16, 2019

    Leaving Syria won’t make things any better — for the US or Syria
    A US military convoy drives on a highway from Kobane to Ain Issa on September 29, 2017.
  • Analysis
  • Leaving Syria won’t make things any better — for the US or Syria

    Responding to Daniel Serwer’s “not so progressive case for withdrawing from Syria,” Charles Lister makes the case that the U.S. should remain in Syria — at the very least for long enough to secure conditions in which a realistic set of objectives could be achieved, including the existing counter-ISIS mission.

    Listen to the Voices of Syria
     People seen waving flags during the protest against the Syrian regime in Idlib in September 2018.
  • Analysis
  • Listen to the Voices of Syria

    Over eight years ago, Syrian men, women, and children took to the streets, often holding hands or clutching roses, calling for political reform. Wahed, Wahed, Wahed, al-Shaab al-Suri Wahed, they chanted — “One, One, One, the Syrian People are One!” But the regime did not listen; instead, we were shot at, gassed, and later bombed. As regime violence escalated, the uprising gradually militarized and what had been a local movement driven by society soon became a vicious conflict driven in large part by foreign governments. Then came al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Hezbollah and soon enough, the lives, thoughts, and desires of ordinary Syrians mattered little.

    August 14, 2019

    A not so progressive case for withdrawing from Syria
    American soldiers board a US Airforce C130 at Baghdad Airport.
  • Analysis
  • A not so progressive case for withdrawing from Syria

    Elizabeth Tsurkov has courageously put forward what she calls a progressive case for staying in Syria. I would regard myself as progressive but I’m not convinced, even if I would have supported many of her arguments in the past. In arguing for an indefinite presence in Syria, Tsurkov relies on the notion that staying gives the U.S. influence over Ankara and Moscow, serves as a counter to Tehran, and pressures the Assad regime, possibly even creating “internal fissures in its senior ranks” and causing “the Assad regime to institute reforms that would benefit all Syrians.” Those fissures and reforms have been desired for the past eight years but have not yet appeared. It would be easier to argue that withdrawal is more likely to cause them, and to pressure Ankara and Moscow into countering Tehran.

    August 8, 2019

    The progressive case for staying in Syria, for now
    A convoy of US forces armoured vehicles drives near the village of Yalanli, on the western outskirts of the northern Syrian city of Manbij, on March 5, 2017
  • Analysis
  • The progressive case for staying in Syria, for now

    Ideally, the various sides of the Syrian civil war would seize the opportunity to reach an agreement. However, the Assad regime’s current intransigence and inability counter ISIS necessitate continued U.S. protection of northeastern Syria and efforts to stabilize it until such a deal can be made. This is not an ideal scenario, but the cost of a pullout at this stage will be immense.

    August 5, 2019

    Monday Briefing: US-Turkey dispute over Syria comes to a head
  • Analysis
  • Monday Briefing: US-Turkey dispute over Syria comes to a head

    This week’s briefing on recent news and upcoming events in the region including the Turkish-U.S. crisis meeting in Ankara on Syria, the resumption of U.S.-Taliban negotiations, Trump’s creation of a new “dovish” line on Iran, a rise in Egypt’s poverty levels, Sudan’s democratic transition, the easing of female guardianship rules in Saudi Arabia, and the end of the ceasefire in Idlib, featuring Charles Lister, Marvin G. Weinbaum, Paul Salem, W. Robert Pearson, Mirette F. Mabrouk, Thomas W. Lippman, and Robert S. Ford.

    Security in South Yemen
    Fighters from the separatist Southern Transitional Council take control of a pro-government checkpoint in Khormaksar, north of Aden, on January 30, 2018. Separatists in war-ravaged Yemen have surrounded the presidential palace in the government's de facto capital Aden, moving closer Tuesday to taking full control of the southern city.
  • Analysis
  • Security in South Yemen

    The UAE is reducing its military presence in Yemen and redeploying its forces. This news has spread rapidly, prompting many questions about what it could mean for the continuation or possible conclusion of the war in Yemen. However, the move will not affect the whole country equally.

    July 31, 2019

    The Huawei Wars and the 5G Revolution in the Gulf
    Middle East Institute
  • Analysis
  • The Huawei Wars and the 5G Revolution in the Gulf

    The fifth generation of mobile phone networks (5G) is poised to become a key enabler of the digitalization of economies and societies. Digital transformation is at the heart of GCC nations’ ambitions to accelerate economic diversification, deliver public services more effectively and efficiently, and promote sustainable growth. GCC ambitions to accelerate the large-scale deployment of 5G dovetail with those of China’s hi-tech giant Huawei, which is competing for market share in infrastructure and smartphones. However, the US push to stymie Huawei’s efforts to expand the reach of its networking technologies has emerged as a potential stumbling block to more extensive ties between that company and GCC wireless carriers and customers.

    Monday Briefing: Syria’s deadly status quo
  • Analysis
  • Monday Briefing: Syria’s deadly status quo

    This week’s briefing on recent news and upcoming events in the region including Kazakhstan’s upcoming “Astana talks” on Syria, Jared Kushner’s planned visit to the Middle East, the shift in US-Pakistan relations, and Abbas’ announcement that the Palestinian Authority will halt all signed agreements with Israel, featuring Charles Lister, Gerald Feierstein, Marvin G. Weinbaum, and Khaled Elgindy.

    The Gulf states, the “deal of the century,” and the Iranian threat
    Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Jared Kushner, U.S. President Donald Trumps senior White House adviser and son-in-law attend U.S.-led workshop in Manama, Bahrain on June 26, 2019.
  • Analysis
  • The Gulf states, the “deal of the century,” and the Iranian threat

    Many analysts have been dismissive of the plan’s prospects, but for Gulf states like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Bahrain, there’s at least one major reason to line up with Washington on the issue: Iran.

    July 25, 2019

    Divided over narratives: The new fault line in the Arab World
    a helicopter flying over flags at the Ithra center during the 29th Summit of the Arab League in Dhahran in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia on April 15, 2018.
  • Analysis
  • Divided over narratives: The new fault line in the Arab World

    Many of the divisions in the Arab World today are ideological and revolve around narratives — carefully constructed ontological representations of both how the world works and how it is supposed to work conforming to clearly set out interests and values. While the old sectarian narratives might still play an underlying role, what divides Arabs from Morocco to Oman are different grand-strategic visions of the region’s future after the Arab Spring.

    July 24, 2019