This text has been translated by AI and may contain errors.
Skip to Content

Research & Commentary Results

Filter by
8738 Results
Stalemate and violence in Israel-Palestine
Palestinians wave national flags as they march in the streets of the occupied West Bank city of Ramallah, calling for the cessation of divisions between Fatah and Hamas and the unification of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, on January 12, 2019.
  • Commentary
  • Stalemate and violence in Israel-Palestine

    Holding long overdue elections for the Palestinian presidency and the legislative arm of the Palestinian Authority could be a step toward redressing the Fatah-Hamas conflict.

    January 6, 2020

    Algeria remains in crisis
    Algerian protesters take part in an anti-government demonstration in the capital Algiers on January 3, 2020.
  • Commentary
  • Algeria remains in crisis

    The relationship between President Tebboune and the army leadership will be a major factor influencing Algeria’s evolution.

    Idlib could define Syria’s future
    Syrian families, who have been forced to displace despite attacks carried out by Assad regime and Russia, sit on soil field despite the cold weather during winter season at Harbanush village in Idlib, Syria on December 28, 2019.
  • Analysis
  • Idlib could define Syria’s future

    The consequences of what happens in Idlib could come to define the future of Syria — a country already destined for many more years of instability and suffering.

    How we planted the seeds of war with Iran: Decisions made in Washington brought us to this fateful moment
  • Analysis
  • How we planted the seeds of war with Iran: Decisions made in Washington brought us to this fateful moment

    For almost 40 years, American national security officials have looked down the barrel of the gun of war with Iran. I sat in rooms in the White House and Pentagon several times as small groups of senior officials considered what such a war would look like, how it would end, and whether we would be better off for having fought it.

    The answer was always the same: It would be highly destructive in several nations, it would end in a stalemate with the Iranian regime in place, and nothing positive would have been accomplished.

    January 5, 2020

    With Soleimani’s death, war is coming
    Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani (C) attends Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's meeting with the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) in Tehran, Iran on September 18, 2016.
  • Commentary
  • With Soleimani’s death, war is coming

    The killing of Qassem Soleimani is one of the biggest developments in the Middle East in decades — it far eclipses the deaths of Osama bin Laden or Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in terms of strategic significance and implications.

    Why now?
    US President Donald Trump makes a statement on Iran at the Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach Florida, on January 3, 2020.
  • Commentary
  • Why now?

    Just when we thought we had a good understanding of President Donald Trump’s Middle East policy — which boils down to “get out of the region and avoid another endless war there” — he pulls off something dramatic like this.

    January 3, 2020

    A new escalation in the US-Iran crisis
    People gather to stage a protest against the killing of Iranian Revolutionary Guards' Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani by a US air strike in the Iraqi capital Baghdad, after Friday prayer in Tehran, Iran on January 3, 2020.
  • Commentary
  • A new escalation in the US-Iran crisis

    We must keep in mind that Iran exercises what Barack Obama liked to call “strategic patience.” They pursue strategies and tactics that serve their interests, not emotions. Their interests remain to get Trump to ease off on crippling economic sanctions; to maintain or increase their influence in Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon; and to maintain regime security at home. The death of a senior military officer of theirs is significant but doesn’t change their institutional relations, their interests, or their overall strategy. 

    January 3, 2020

    US airstrike prompts widespread Iraqi criticism
    Supporters of the predominantly Shia Muslim Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) gather with flags and posters of the PMF deputy head Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis during an anti-US protest after the US airstrike in Baghdad
  • Commentary
  • US airstrike prompts widespread Iraqi criticism

    In the wake of the airstrike, there have been many calls inside Iraq for restraint among Iraqis and between the Americans and the Iranians, most notably from the Shi’a clerical establishment in Najaf. There is a wide consensus in Iraq that the country should not be at the center of an American-Iranian military fight.

    The old rules of the game have been shattered
     A protester stands inside a burned checkpoint during the sit-in against deadly US airstrikes on sites of a Shiite militia in front of the US embassy. Iraqi mourners on Tuesday stormed the building of the US embassy in Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone.
  • Commentary
  • The old rules of the game have been shattered

    The killing of Gen. Qassem Soleimani, head of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Quds Force, was a major and unexpected blow to the Iranian leadership. It punctured the aura of invincibility and the hubris that have characterized Soleimani and his colleagues’ behavior.

    January 3, 2020

    Soleimani's killing: A turning point, but not necessarily a prelude to war
    Middle East Institute
  • Commentary
  • Soleimani's killing: A turning point, but not necessarily a prelude to war

    No one in Tehran can now afford to test the limits of Donald Trump’s unpredictability. He is the man who for years lamented American interventions in the Middle East only to shock the Iranians by killing the leading symbol of Iran’s regional agenda. 

    Refugees Adrift? Responses to Crises in the MENA and Asia
    Middle East Institute
  • Analysis
  • Refugees Adrift? Responses to Crises in the MENA and Asia

    This essay series explores the human costs and policy challenges associated with the displacement crises in the Middle East and Asia.

    In 2014 the UNHCR reported that the number of people forced to flee their homes had exceeded 50 million for the first time since World War Two, and that the exponential increase in the number of those forcibly displaced had already stretched aid organisations and host countries nearly to the breaking point. 

    January 1, 2020

    Civil Society and Political Transitions in the MENA Region and Southeast Asia
    Middle East Institute
  • Analysis
  • Civil Society and Political Transitions in the MENA Region and Southeast Asia

    The MENA and Southeast Asia regions have undergone and continue to undergo massive political transitions.  Differences in the process and outcomes of their transitions can be viewed through the lens of a “civil society infrastructure” and the qualitative differences in both these regions. This essay series engages a variety of issues regarding the roles and impact of civil society organizations (CSOs) in these two regions during the transition and pre-transition periods as well as in instances where the political transition is completed.

    January 1, 2020