Naade Ali is currently serving as a Research Assistant to Dr. Marvin G. Weinbaum, Director for Pakistan and Afghanistan Studies at the Middle East Institute (MEI). He has over five years of involvement working with international organizations and think tanks in different capacities as a political researcher, policy advisor, peace strategist, and human rights practitioner, with a demonstrated interest and experience in human and national security, democratization, conflict resolution, and political culture. Prior to joining MEI, Ali worked with Media Foundation 360, a think tank dedicated to strengthening democratic practices in Pakistan.
He has also worked for the Multinational Development Policy Dialogue of Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, a bridge-builder between the European Union and the Global South that implements and facilitates multi-stakeholder dialogue on sustainable development, with a focus on the nexus of democracy and governance, peace and security, and climate and energy. He was also involved with Open European Dialogue of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, a politically neutral platform for Europe’s policymakers that convenes political dialogues and policy workshops on key political challenges.
Ali holds a Master of Science in International Relations: Global Governance and Social Theory from the University of Bremen, as well as a graduate training certification in Multilateralism from the United Nations Office in Geneva. He is a former fellow at the Hansen Institute on Leadership and International Cooperation at the University of San Diego, where he received hands-on training in diplomacy, mediation, and conflict resolution.
A Strategic Conundrum: Pakistan’s Transit Corridor to Iran as Lifeline or Liability
The US-Iran standoff over the Strait of Hormuz — disruptive to global trade and energy flows, and devastating for debt-burdened economies — has handed Pakistan an unexpected geoeconomic opportunity, one that may persist even if the framework agreement announced on June 14 results in a lasting peace and permanent reopening of the strait. But seizing it will have interlocking consequences for Islamabad’s ties with Tehran, Washington, and the Gulf states.
The Pakistan-Afghanistan conflict: A strategic concern for the US
Pakistan’s relationship with the Afghan Taliban has shifted from open sponsorship in the 1990s to a silent partnership following 2001 to alienation and belligerence since 2021. Their current conflict, which comes at great cost to both countries and seems to have no easy military or political resolution, also poses a threat to the stability and prosperity of neighboring states. Although American strategic interests in the region greatly diminished following the United States’ military withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, the region’s altered political dynamics have prompted a growing American engagement with Pakistan and tentatively with Afghanistan. At the same time, the US has become a factor in how both Islamabad and Kabul have come to form their national security strategies.
اتفاق الدفاع الاستراتيجي بين باكستان والمملكة العربية السعودية: بنية أمنية جديدة في منطقة الشرق الأوسط الكبير
في أعقاب الضربة التي شنتها إسرائيل في 9 سبتمبر على أهداف لحماس في قطر، اتخذت باكستان خطوات سريعة وهامة في سياستها الخارجية رداً على ذلك، واتخذت موقفاً حازماً بشكل غير معتاد. وقد تأثر هذا التحول إلى حد كبير بقائد الجيش الباكستاني، المشير عاصم منير. فالأخير مصمم على تعزيز الاستقلالية الاستراتيجية لبلاده ونفوذها الدبلوماسي في بيئة دولية تزداد تعقيداً، من خلال وضع باكستان في موقع الفاعل الأمني الرئيسي والقوة المتوسطة الصاعدة على الساحة العالمية.
قدرة باكستان على التوفيق بين علاقاتها مع الولايات المتحدة وإيران تختبرها الحرب بين إسرائيل وإيران
عندما اندلعت الحرب بين إسرائيل وإيران وقررت الولايات المتحدة مساعدة الجانب الإسرائيلي بضرب برنامج إيران النووي، توقعت كل من طهران وواشنطن أن تقف إسلام أباد إلى جانب مواقفهما. وضع هذا الوضع الحكومة الباكستانية في موقف حساس سياسياً ودبلوماسياً.
إرث الحرب الهندية الباكستانية التي استمرت أربعة أيام
أدى التصعيد الأخير القصير والمكثف للأعمال العدائية بين الهند وباكستان إلى كشف المزيد من هشاشة الوضع الأمني في جنوب آسيا. فقد أدى الصدام العسكري المتبادل الذي استمر أربعة أيام عبر الحدود بين البلدين المتنافسين الحائزين على أسلحة نووية إلى تقويض آفاق التطبيع بشكل كبير، وإعادة تعريف قواعد الاشتباك، والإشارة إلى حدوث تحول في الطريقة التي قد يدير بها البلدان علاقتهما في المستقبل.
الآلاف من اللاجئين الأفغان الذين كانوا يتمتعون بالحماية في الولايات المتحدة يواجهون الترحيل
أصبح الانسحاب الفوضوي للجيش الأمريكي من أفغانستان في أغسطس 2021 قضية انتخابية ساخنة في الانتخابات الرئاسية لعام 2024 ولا يزال صداها يتردد حتى اليوم. وقد انتقد الرئيس دونالد ترامب، الذي بدأ عملية الانسحاب خلال ولايته الأولى، مرارًا وتكرارًا إدارة الرئيس جو بايدن لتركها وراءها معدات عسكرية بقيمة مليارات الدولارات. كما تركت وراءها عشرات الآلاف من الأفغان وأفراد أسرهم، الذين واجهوا انتقامًا لمساعدتهم القوات الأمريكية في القتال ضد طالبان.
انسحاب الولايات المتحدة والديناميات الأمنية الإقليمية الجديدة في جوار أفغانستان
تشهد الدول المجاورة لأفغانستان عملية إعادة هيكلة جوهرية لنظامها الأمني. وتواصل الدول الإقليمية الرئيسية، وهي باكستان وأفغانستان وإيران والصين، تعديل خططها الدفاعية وشراكاتها الأمنية لمواجهة التهديدات المتزايدة التي يشكلها الإرهاب المحلي والعابر للحدود. وفي الوقت نفسه، تبحث هذه الدول الأربع عن سبل جديدة لملء الفراغ الذي خلفه انسحاب الجيش الأمريكي من أفغانستان في جنوب آسيا.
The strategic alliance between Pakistan and China, driven largely by opportunism and geostrategic interests, seems unshakable. However, the extent of its mutual benefit remains under scrutiny, especially for Islamabad, whose reliance on Beijing continues to deepen. Although China claims to base its foreign policy interactions on five key principles — respect for sovereignty, non-aggression, non-interference, equality and mutual benefit, and peaceful coexistence — its dealings with Pakistan indicate an unequal power dynamic that primarily serves its own interests. This imbalance in the Pakistan-China strategic alliance has led to a situation in which Islamabad’s autonomy is increasingly curtailed, and its vulnerability to Beijing’s influence is becoming more apparent.
Pakistan's Independence Day highlights deepening ideological divide
On Aug. 14, Pakistan celebrated its 78th Independence Day against the backdrop of a widening ideological and societal divide between proponents of Islamic nationalism and those championing democracy. Seizing the occasion, both the military and political leaders, recognizing Pakistan’s vulnerability to political instability and eroding social cohesion, have sought to shape the national discourse and sway public opinion with their respective narratives.
Pakistan’s political scene looks increasingly unsettled and complicated
The deep rift between the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party and Pakistan’s civil-military establishment shows no sign of weakening but appears to be shifting. The coalition government and its military sponsors, so recently seen as having taken command of the political heights, are now showing signs of panicking as they appear to be losing the initiative and ability to set the narrative.
The newly formed government coalition in Islamabad initially looked weak, unstable, and probably short lived. But in the weeks since the outcome of the vote was announced, the political landscape has rapidly changed. Nevertheless, there are portents of trouble ahead that could send Pakistan back into the political tangle from which it has so recently emerged.
What to expect as Pakistan goes to the polls for a long-awaited national election
Though delayed by several months, Pakistan is now on the verge of a national election on Feb. 8 that will replace an elected government ousted in April 2022 by an opposition-cum-military alliance.
Pakistan’s military and foreign policy under Gen. Asim Munir
Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa orchestrated a paradigm shift in Pakistan’s traditional geostrategic focus, transitioning from geopolitics to geoeconomics. His successor, Gen. Asim Munir, in command of Pakistan’s military for the past year, now faces the challenging task of turning Gen. Bajwa’s unrealized vision into a reality, a goal that requires cultivating positive interdependence and multi-alignment with a diverse range of partners, while also ensuring domestic stability.
